Program Notes | September 24, 2011 | Opening Night
Notes researched & written by Joan Olsson
MAURICE RAVEL
1875 – 1937
“Ma Mere L’Oye” (Mother Goose Suite) 1910
Youngster Maurice Ravel was musically gifted and destined for a music career from early childhood. He entered the Paris Conservatory at age 14 where he studied for the next 15 years. From the beginning of his musical career Ravel followed a clear, direct path. He learned through studies of the classics that in order to know one’s own technique, one must learn the technique of others; no one ever finishes the jobs of learning and shaping a technique or a style.
The shy composer avoided tragedy in his art; his favorite themes dealt with Spanish rhythm, dance, comedy and enchantment. Ravel’s natural gift for orchestration and musical “coloring” created scores that were unmatched for his brilliant use of instrumental timbres. His music has been compared to French gardens in which trees and shrubs are trimmed to precise shapes and flowers are laid out in well-ordered patterns. He took painstaking time to polish each work to a shimmering crown of jewels; as a result the composer’s life-long output totaled fewer than 70 works.
Ravel was a complex, sensitive person with an unusual fascination with the world of children. A life-long collector of toys, he also loved children’s stories and illustrations, and often sneaked away from social get-togethers to play with the toys and games of youngsters in residence.
In 1908 the composer wrote a children’s piano duet for two of his young friends. The work consisted of five tableaus from ancient French fairy tales that dealt with moralistic issues. In translation the suite is “The Mother Goose Suite,” but the composer singled out a single image from each story rather than musically illustrate the whole plot. His representations are the musical equivalent of watercolors and etchings and contain a complete range of dynamics and emotion.
I. Pavane of the Sleeping Princess – This presents a graceful, ancient dance by attendants surrounding the Sleeping Princess Florine. Both flute and harp are featured prominently in this baroque dance.
II. Little Tom Thumb – Tom’s frustrated wanderings in the woods are depicted by continual meter changes by string passages, while the woodwinds play a quiet “walking” melody. Twittering birds (flute, piccolo) swoop down to steal the crumbs left to mark his return path.
III. Laideronnette, Empress of the Pagodas – Exotic Javanese music paints a picture of the little empress taking her bath while her pagodes (tiny munchkin-like people) sing and play on their miniature percussive instruments. The musical flavor is turn-of-the-century orientalism styled by pentatonic scales.
IV. Beauty and the Beast – The clarinet represents Beauty in the tempo of a waltz, while the role of the Beast is assumed by a contrabassoon. A dialogue between the two alternates between brusque growls and lilting melodies. After a loud climax and a measure of silence, an expressive solo violin announces with a delicate glissando the change of the Beast into a handsome prince. A moment before this, Beauty had decided that she would marry the beast because of his inner beauty and kindness.
V. The Enchanted Garden – Everyone lives happily and in peace in this musically delicate watercolor depicting the splendor of an enchanting fairyland. The music builds to a grand fanfare celebrating that all is good and beautiful.
ROBERT SCHUMANN
1810 – 1856
Symphony No. 2 in C Major, Op. 61 1845
Few dispute that Robert Schumann was the most romantic of the Romantics, with musicologists talking of the new “hero” of the Romantic Era. In his approach to composition Schumann was the musical dissenter of his time. He saw little reason to honor the Classical structure because he recognized its strict limitations. As a result the adventurous Schumann was uncertain and melancholy even during his most productive years. He was plagued by personal psychological struggles and held concern for the future of the symphonic form since the most influential innovators of the time, Beethoven and Schubert, were in their graves.
It was in 1841 at the end of one of his many mental and physical convalescent periods that Schumann began working in symphonic form.
In his Symphony No. 2 the movements are interrelated by a recurrence of themes.
First Movement: The first motif appears in the brass during the brooding slow introduction to the first movement and returns later amid the turbulence of that same movement and is repeated again briefly in the second and fourth movements. Schumann wrote, “It is filled with struggle and is very capricious and obstinate in character.” The brass fanfare is heard simultaneously with a wavy theme pitched low in the strings. That line is as harmonically ambiguous as the brass fanfare is decisive. The music increases gradually, gaining tempo and conflicts erupt and warring elements clash before the finale, giving the impression that the darkness has been momentarily lifted.
Second Movement: This fast scherzo is a happy, spirited showcase for strings. The pace lets up for the movement’s two contrasting trios — the first being a melody shared by strings and woodwinds, while the second is a subdued meditation for strings and woodwinds. In the end, the brasses sing out their fanfare from the first movement.
Third Movement: This movement has long been regarded as one of the composer’s most sublime musical sections. Melancholic and tranquil, solo opportunities are provided for oboe, clarinet and bassoon.
Fourth Movement: From the robust march-like beginning to the long, optimistic ending, it is clear that Schumann has regained good physical and mental health. The joyful finale sweeps away the clouds that have been hanging over the symphony. The gentle theme (a solo oboe) appearing midway is by Beethoven from his song cycle To the Distant Beloved. The composer is paying tribute to his beloved wife Clara.
RICHARD STRAUSS
1864 – 1949
Der Rosenkavalier Suite (Rose Cavalier) 1910
Richard Strauss was considered one of the foremost and versatile composers and conductors of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. He was known for creating a wide spectrum of works in different forms and style and particularly noted for his interpretations of his idol Mozart. Der Rosenkavalier is Strauss’ homage to Mozart and closely resembles The Marriage of Figaro with a similar convoluted, comical plot with moments of sadness and regret. The three-act opera brought Strauss great fame and financial success and became the most popular German opera of the 1900s. The eccentric, flamboyant composer began introducing himself as, “I am Strauss, composer of Der Rosenkavalier.”
It is an entertainingly frisky comedy — a half sentimental, half cynical story about life in 18th century Vienna during the reign of Maria Therese.
The main action revolves around an aging (mid-thirties) field marshal’s wife, Marschallin, who is in love with young, 17-year-old Octavian who, because of the age difference, will most likely leave her and fall in love with someone his own age. Prominently featured is a cousin, the bumbling, lecherous, obnoxious Baron who has arranged to marry young Sophe, daughter of a wealthy merchant. As tradition has it, Octavian is chosen as knight of the rose, presenter of a silver rose to the bride-to-be. The rose is offered in a glorious duet, but the situation also becomes “love at first sight” for Octavian and Sophe. The rest of the plot involves jealousy in operation, cross-dressing, humorous trickery and connivance, and show-stopping Viennese waltzes — a form not even in existence during the opera’s time period. Of strong musical appeal is a trio from Act III in which the saddened Marschallin surrenders Octavian to Sophe and the two lovers overflow with love and gratitude.
Nearly every work of Strauss’ begins with a great expansion of energy, a leaping upwards followed by a culmination of force, size and intricacy of parts. Strauss never lost the stamp of a Wagner worshipper and so melody lines are often very complex with lots of musical ornaments and runs. The orchestration is thick with sound as instrumental sections play with or against each other without pause. As a result Strauss’ music has the reputation of being incredibly difficult to perform. To quote renowned music critic Lawrence Gilman, “It is the orchestra, at the end, that caps the rough and tumble poetic comedy, and turns the horseplay into loveliness, crowning the drama with a quality of beauty that brought a new accent and unsuspected eloquence to musical art.”